I have started a new game of Civilization. I find myself experimenting with some of the things I do in the game, more so than I did in the beginning. I have no progressed to the Middle Ages and have established trade and power amongst the other Civilizations, and like last time I created a strong military force. However one of the changes I have made in my strategy regarding trade is that, I am more forthcoming about trading with other civilizations that have more to offer rather than them coming to me. This then helps me appear to be a stronger empire.
I recently read the book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by Jack Perkins. I refers to how countries, particularly the United States are able to expand there “empire” the money, loans and debt. Although it applies to the modern world, I think parts are applicable to my own came of Civilization. I do believe that this theory of having an empire through acquisition of debt could also be acquired through trade like this has consequently influenced my strategy in playing the game. So instead of going to war with other countries that I really do not need to expand my boarders, I am attempting to control the smaller civilizations through trade. Jim Garrison is quoted in the book saying:

Taken cumulatively, the integration of the world as a whole, particularly in terms of economic globalization and the mythic qualities of “free market” capitalism represents a veritable “empire” in its own right…. No nation on earth has been able to resist the compelling magnetism of globalization. Pg 199- 200

Although in the game it does not quite apply to the scale you can take aspects from it and apply it to the game. By supplying them with key elements they need for their economy, they consequently listen to me and I therefore have influence over what they do. I am able to go to them this game and tell them to stop trading with my civilizations biggest threat. I am therefore in control without ever going to war.

Reference:
Perkins, John – Confessions of and Economic Hit Man.